首页> 外文OA文献 >Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman
【2h】

Rekonstruksi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Kemandirian Kekuasaan Kehakiman

机译:司法独立性视角下的印尼刑事司法制度重构

摘要

Criminal justice system as a tool of law enforcement, didn\u27t work optimally in Indonesia. It often being used by executive power because its position and function didn\u27t independent and subordinated by executive power. Judicial power is an independent power, but other subsistem in CJS such as investigative power, prosecution power, and Executors power structurally and functionally are under executive power, and as result that their roles as a power instrument to service power\u27s interest. This research purpose to set ideal format in integrated CJS working , to manifest judicial power in the independency and integrated criminal law enforcement through reconstruction and reorientation of criminal justice system construction, substantial and cultural. Main object in this research is criminal law enforcement policy, juridical normative and sociological approach, primary and secondary data as a main data to qualitative analyzing. The result of this research show that function of subsystem in criminal justice system (such as investigation, prosecution, and execution power ) have not show independent yet, cause of under the executive power. Anyway judicial power is set as independent power out of executive power, in organizationing, budgeting, staffing, and carrier system under one roof system that subordinated by Supreme Court . Here CJS is unsystemic but partially and fragmentair. This situation result subsytem rivality and in the end can be barrier in CJS performances. There is policy measures to implement integrally of independency criminal justice system by systemic approach to reset related policy in the law substance, the law structure and the law culture.
机译:刑事司法系统作为执法工具,在印度尼西亚并未发挥最佳作用。它经常被执行机构使用,因为它的位置和功能不是独立的,而是被执行机构所服从。司法权是一种独立的权力,但是CJS中的其他分支机构,例如调查权,起诉权和执行人权,在结构和功能上均处于执行权之下,因此,它们作为服务权力的权力工具所发挥的作用也受到了利益的影响。本研究的目的是通过整合和重新定位实质性和文化性的刑事司法制度建设,为整合的CJS工作树立理想的格式,通过独立和整合的刑事执法体现司法权力。本研究的主要对象是刑事执法政策,法律规范和社会学方法,主要和次要数据作为定性分析的主要数据。研究结果表明,子系统在刑事司法系统中的功能(如调查,起诉和执行力)尚未表现出独立性,是执行力不足的原因。无论如何,在最高法院下属的一个屋顶系统下,在组织,预算,人员配备和承运人系统中,司法权被设置为执行权之外的独立权力。这里的CJS是非系统性的,但部分是碎片化的。这种情况导致子系统之间的竞争,最终可能会阻碍CJS性能。有采取系统性措施整体实施独立刑事司法制度的政策措施,以重新设置法律实质,法律结构和法律文化中的相关政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pujiyono, Pujiyono;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ID
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:53:34

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号